brand NEW BEDFORD a brand new Bedford priest accused of intimately abusing a small has filed a defamation suit from the Bishop regarding the Diocese of Fall River. Daniel Lacroix, 61, ended up being added to administrative leave for so-called misconduct in November 2019. During the right time, he had been serving as co-pastor at three North End churches St. Joseph-St. Therese, St. Mary, and Our Lady of Fatima Parishes.
A Ministerial Review Board in 2020 determined the allegations of sexual abuse of a minor were credible and subsequently removed Lacroix permanently from ministry november. On Feb. 29, Lacroix filed the lawsuit relief that is seeking the Fall River Diocese Bishop Edgar M. da Cunha, whom he group beach sex states «significantly and irreparably» harmed their reputation.
Based on a pr release from Lacroix’s lawyer, Philip Beauregard, the extracted pastor just isn’t searching for payment for monetary losings; he could be rather searching for vindication and a declaratory judgment that he failed to participate in the misconduct that is alleged.
вЂњMy customer happens to be viciously slandered, and their whole life and job have already been placed on hold, all without the way of measuring due procedure,вЂќ Beauregard stated into the declaration. вЂњFather LacroixвЂ™s repeated appeals towards the defendant together with diocese have now been met with apathy and silence, and meanwhile, he’s got been rejected their vocation, their livelihood, and their reputation. This lawsuit is supposed to provide him the chance to prove their purity to these heinous costs.вЂќ
The Standard-Times’ contacted Beauregard to obtain remark from Lacroix, nonetheless they failed to react.
Alleged abuse in 1990s
In line with the diocese, the so-called misconduct stumbled on light following the church applied brand new reforms in 2017 that instituted a review process that is external. This comes due to information gathered during an external post on the DioceseвЂ™s workers files,вЂќ a previous pr release stated. вЂњThe information pertains to misconduct that is alleged thought to have happened years ago, that needs further investigation.вЂќ
A heavily redacted report that is investigative the Bristol County District Attorney’s workplace, which The Standard-Times obtained in December 2020, states the target came to be in 1970. In accordance with other dates when you look at the report, Lacroix could have been 26 yrs old if the alleged punishment began, and 32 or 33 years old at the time of the incident that is last. The target could have been 15 years of age if the so-called punishment began, and 21 or 22 years old at the time of the incident that is last. Beauregard formerly told the Standard-Times Lacroix ended up being acting as being a camp therapist as he was at the seminary and that the person that made the allegations had been a camper.
In terms of any relationship amongst the two, the lawyer stated it had been absolutely absolutely absolutely nothing besides that of a camp therapist and camper. Bristol County District Attorney representative Gregg Miliote stated in a contact whenever Lacroix was initially eliminated that the region lawyer’s workplace received and «completely» evaluated the situation, but ended up being not able to bring any fees given that statue of restrictions had expired.
Lacroix suing for libel
The issue states two investigations undertaken by da Cunha’s predecessor lead to exoneration, and therefore Lacroix offered to have a lie detector test, but da Cunha «ignored» the offer. It states that after chatting with the news, da Cunha neglected to consist of the allegations are denied by that Lacroix.
Into the last point, the grievance states the Fall River bishop includes a «bias and predisposition» from serving as being a priest and bishop in nj-new jersey, where he «had a link» having a cardinal, Theodore McCarrick, who had been fundamentally ended for intimate misconduct. Lacroix has rejected the allegations since he had been first positioned on leave. He formerly told The Standard-Times he thought the misconduct allegations had been «possibly instance of mistaken identity.»
An unredacted part of the report shows Lacroix knew the target for many years and co-signed financing for him.
Beauregard formerly told The Standard-Times that Lacroix’s most useful description is still mistaken identification, and that there ended up being another priest or seminarian that worked during the exact exact exact same camp, вЂњwho has since been alleged and discovered to possess committed intimate misconduct and floated from the priesthood and area.вЂќ The lawyer failed to name the priest as well as the Standard-Times failed to find recommendations to your St. Vincent De Paul camp and misconduct.
Da Cunha, reached for remark through the Fall River Diocese communications workplace, would not straight react. Any office rather offered a declaration, which in component reiterated statements that are previous their research. The declaration said the diocese «noted» Lacroix denied the accusations when put on leave in 2019, and that da Cunha’s solution in a brand new Jersey parish while McCarrick ended up being the archbishop is unrelated for this matter.
«Father LacroixвЂ™s title seems one of many Priests Accused of Sexual Abuse of a small within the Diocese of Fall River due to a reasonable and thorough writeup on the allegations carried out by many professionals,» the diocese statement stated. In accordance with Beauregard, a diocese and bishop under Massachusetts legislation cannot «normally» be held accountable for defamation of the priest. Nevertheless, he hopes the state will «allow some type of relief» to Lacroix, he published. вЂњEssentially, the defendant in this instance is serving as judge, jury, and executioner to Father Lacroix,» Beauregard published. Lacroix is searching for a jury trial, based on the full instance docket.